Studi e risultati

• Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, Loeber O, Ozalp S, Webb A. Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10: 51–8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625180500035231

• Heller R, Purcell C, Mackay L, Caird L, Cameron ST. Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 123: 1684–91.
  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.14117/abstract

• Jones RK, Henshaw SK. Mifepristone for Early Medical Abortion: Experiences in France, Great Britain and Sweden. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002; 34: 154–61. https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2002/05/mifepristone-early-medical-abortion-experiences-france-great-britain-and
• Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, Loeber O, Ozalp S, Webb Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10: 51–8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625180500035231

• Andión-Ibañez X, Zampas C. Conscientious Objection to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: International Human Rights Standards and European Law and Practice. Eur J Health Law 2012; 19: 231–56.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22916532       

• Berer M. Termination of pregnancy as emergency obstetric care: the interpretation of Catholic health policy and the consequences for pregnant women: an analysis of the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland and similar cases. Reprod Health Matters 2013; 21: 9–17.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684182

• Bo M, Zotti CM, Charrier L. Conscientious objection and waiting time for voluntary abortion in Italy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2015; 20: 272–82.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592398

• Campbell M. Conscientious objection and the Council of Europe: The right to conscientious objection in lawful medical care Resolution 1763 (2010) Resolution adopted by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly. Med Law Rev 2011; 19: 467–75.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798996

• Chavkin W, Leitman L, Polin K, for Global Doctors for Choice. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: A White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2013; 123: S41–56.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24332234

• Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: An international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights 2017; 19: 55–68. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473038/
• Cook R, Dickens BM. The Growing Abuse of Conscientious Objection. Ethics J Am Med Assoc 2006; 8: 337–40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232431

• De Zordo S. Interruption volontaire de grossesse et clause de conscience en Italie et en Espagne, entre droits des femmes et « droits » du fœtus/patient. Sociol Santé; 38: 107–29.
• De Zordo S, Mishtal J, Anton L. A Fragmented Landscape Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. Berghahn Books, 2016. https://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/DeZordoFragmented

• Fiala C, Arthur JH. ‘Dishonourable disobedience’ – Why refusal to treat in reproductive healthcare is not conscientious objection. Woman – Psychosom Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 1: 12–23.
  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213560X14000034

• Fiala C, Arthur JH. There is no defence for ‘Conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; published online July 23.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757115

• Fiala C, Gemzell Danielsson K, Heikinheimo O, Guðmundsson JA, Arthur J. Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2016; 21: 201–6.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26838273

• Heino A, Gissler M, Apter D, Fiala C. Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2013; 18: 231–3.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23848269

• Kibsgaard Nordberg EM, Skirbekk H, Magelssen M. Conscientious objection to referrals for abortion: pragmatic solution or threat to women’s rights? BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571955

• Lertxundi R, Ibarrondo O, Merki-Feld GS, Rey-Novoa M, Rowlands S, Mar J. Proposal to inform European institutions regarding the regulation of conscientious objection to abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2016; 213: 198–200.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26986562

• Mishtal, J.Z. Matters of ‘Conscience’: The Politics of Reproductive Health and Rights in Poland. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 2009; 23(2):161-183.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562954

• Mishtal, J. Reproductive Governance in the New Europe: Competing Visions of Morality, Sovereignty, and Supranational Policy. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 2014, 23(1):59-76.
  https://www.berghahnjournals.com/abstract/journals/ajec/23/1/ajec230104.xml

• Morrell KM, Chavkin W. Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 27: 333–8.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241174

• Opinion N° 4-2005: The right to conscientious objection and the conclusion by EU member states of concordats with the Holy See. 2005 https://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/cfr_cdfopinion4_2005_en.pdf.
  
• Roe J, Francome C, Bush M. Recruitment and training of British obstetrician-gynaecologists for abortion provision: conscientious objection versus opting out. Reprod Health Matters 1999; 7: 97–105.
  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90010-1

• Strickland SL. Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey. J Med Ethics 2011; 38: 22–5.
  https://jme.bmj.com/content/38/1/22

• Chełstowska A. Stigmatisation and commercialisation of abortion services in Poland: turning sin into gold. Reprod Health Matters 2011; 19: 98–106.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21555090

• De Zordo S. From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña. Glob Public Heal An Int J Res Policy Pract 2017; 1–13.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278744

• De Zordo S, Mishtal J. Physicians and Abortion: Provision, Political Participation and Conflicts on the Ground-The Cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Heal Issues 2011; 21: S32–6.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530836

• Purcell C, Cameron S, Caird L, et al. Access to and experience of later abortion: accounts from women in Scotland. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014; 46: 101–8.
  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1363/46e1214/full

• Purcell C, Hilton S, Mcdaid L. The stigmatisation of abortion: a qualitative analysis of print media in Great Britain in 2010. Cult Health Sex 2014; 16.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115952
  
• Welsh P, McCarthy M, Cromer B. Abortion in Adolescence: A Four-Country Comparison. Women’s Health Issues 2001; 11: 73–9.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11275509
• Hoggart L, Newton VL, Bury L. Repeat abortion’, a phrase to be avoided? Qualitative insights into labelling and stigma. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2017; 43:26-30.
  https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/43/1/26

• Baron C, Cameron S, Johnstone A. Do women seeking termination of pregnancy need pre-abortion counselling? Fam Plann Reprod Heal Care 2015; 45: 181–5.
  https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/41/3/181

• Cochrane RA, Cameron ST. Attitudes of Scottish abortion care providers towards provision of abortion after 16 weeks’ gestation within Scotland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2013; 18: 215–20.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23521135

• De Zordo S, Mishtal J. Physicians and Abortion: Provision, Political Participation and Conflicts on the Ground-The Cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Heal Issues 2011; 21: S32–6.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530836

• Doran F, Nancarrow S. Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care 2015; 41: 170–80.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106103

• Francome C, Freeman E. British general practitioners’ attitudes toward Abortion. Fam Plann Perspect 2000; 32: 189–91.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10942355

• Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, et al. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet 2006; 368: 1908–19.
  https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673606694816/abstract

• Heller R, Purcell C, Mackay L, Caird L, Cameron ST. Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 123: 1684–91.
  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.14117/abstract

• Jones RK, Henshaw SK. Mifepristone for Early Medical Abortion: Experiences in France, Great Britain and Sweden. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002; 34: 154–61. https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2002/05/mifepristone-early-medical-abortion-experiences-france-great-britain-and
  
• Lee E, Ingham R. Why do women present late for induced abortion? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 479–89.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20338814

• Lohr PA. Surgical Abortion in the Second Trimester. Reprod Health Matters 2008; 16: 31–151.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18772096

• Marie Stopes International. General practitioners: attitudes to abortion 2007. 2007. https://www.shnwales.org.uk/Documents/485/Report,%20GPs%20attitudes%20to%20abortion%202007%20Marie%20Stopes.pdf
• Moreau C, Bajos N, Bouyer J, Group C. Access to health care for induced abortions Analysis by means of a French national survey. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14: 369–74.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546817

• Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, Loeber O, Ozalp S, Webb A. Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10: 51–8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625180500035231

• Rowlands S, López-Arregui E. How health services can improve access to abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2015; 5187: 1–3.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26556640

• Caird L, Cameron ST, Hough T, Mackay L, Glasier A. Initiatives to close the gap in inequalities in abortion provision in a remote and rural UK setting. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care 2015; 42: 68 LP-70.
  https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/42/1/68

• Haut Conseil à l’Égalité entre les femmes et les hommes. Accès à l’avortement D’importants progrès réalisés, un accès réel qui peut encore être conforté. 2017
  https://www.haut-conseil-egalite.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/hce_bilan_mise_en_oeuvre_recos_ivg_2017_01_17_vf.pdf

• Haut Conseil à l’Égalité entre les femmes et les hommes. Rapport relatif à l’accès à l’IVG Volet 2: Accès à l’IVG dans les territoires. 2013
  https://www.haut-conseil-egalite.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_ivg_volet2_v10-2.pdf

• Jones RK, Henshaw SK. Mifepristone for Early Medical Abortion: Experiences in France, Great Britain and Sweden. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002; 34: 154–61. https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2002/05/mifepristone-early-medical-abortion-experiences-france-great-britain-and
• Moreau C, Bajos N, Bouyer J, Group C. Access to health care for induced abortions Analysis by means of a French national survey. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14: 369–74.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546817

• Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, Loeber O, Ozalp S, Webb A. Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10: 51–8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625180500035231

• Aiken ARA, Gomperts R, Trussell J. Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at-home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a population-based analysis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 124: 1208–15.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748001

• Berer M. Termination of pregnancy as emergency obstetric care: the interpretation of Catholic health policy and the consequences for pregnant women:an analysis of the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland and similar cases. Reprod Health Matters 2013; 21: 9–17.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684182

• Best A. Abortion Rights along the Irish-English Border and the Liminality of Women’s Experiences. Dialect Anthropol 2005; 29: 423–37.
  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-005-3863-x

• Bloomer F, O’Dowd K. Restricted access to abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: exploring abortion tourism and barriers to legal reform. Health Sex. 2014; 16: 366–80.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24617662

• Gilmartin M, White A. Interrogating Medical Tourism: Ireland, Abortion, and Mobility Rights. Signs J Women Cult Soc 2010; 36: 275–80.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21114071

• Mishtal J. Quiet Contestations of Irish Abortion Law: Abortion Politics in Flux? In: Transcending Borders: Abortion in the Past and Present, Pelgrave Macmillan 2017.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-48399-3_12

• Rossiter A. Ireland’s hidden diaspora: the ‘abortion trail’ and the making of a London-Irish underground 1980–2000. IASC Publishing. 2009.
• Rossiter A, Sexton M. The other Irish journey: A survey update of Northern Irish women attending British abortion clinics, 2000/2001. 2000. https://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/download/irish_document.pdf
• Smyth, L. ‘And Nobody Was Any the Wiser’: Irish Abortion Rights and the European Union. In: Sexual Politics and the European Union, Berghahn Books 1996: 109-130.

• Chełstowska A. Stigmatisation and commercialisation of abortion services in Poland: turning sin into gold. Reprod Health Matters 2011; 19: 98–106.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21555090

• Czerwinski A. Sex, Politics, and Religion: The Clash between Poland and the European Union over Abortion. Denver J Int Law Policy 2003; 32.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16482688

• Federation for Women and Famly Planning. Reproductive Health Services in Poland: Country Report.
  https://www.astra.org.pl/pdf/publications/POLAND.pdf

• Girard, F, and W. Nowicka. Clear and Compelling Evidence: The Polish Tribunal on Abortion Rights. Reproductive Health Matters 2002; 10(19): 22–30.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12369330

• Mishtal, J. The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Ohio University Press 2015.
  https://www.ohioswallow.com/book/The+Politics+of+Morality

• Center for Reproductive Rights. Tysiac v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights). Cent Reprod Rights 2008.
  https://www.reproductiverights.org/case/tysiac-v-poland-european-court-of-human-rights

• Bo M, Zotti CM, Charrier L. Conscientious objection and waiting time for voluntary abortion in Italy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2015; 20: 272–82.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592398

• Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: An international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights 2017; 19: 55–68. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473038/
  
• De Zordo S. From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña. Glob Public Heal An Int J Res Policy Pract 2017; March:1–13.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278744

• De Zordo S. Interruption volontaire de grossesse et clause de conscience en Italie et en Espagne, entre droits des femmes et « droits » du fœtus/patient. Sociol Santé; 38: 107–29.
• De Zordo S. ‘Good doctors do not object’: Obstetricians-Gynaecolosists’ Perspectives on Conscientious Objection to Abortion Care and their Engagement with Pro-abortion Rights Protests in Italy. In: A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books, 2016
  https://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/DeZordoFragmented#toc

• Morrell KM, Chavkin W. Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 27: 333–8.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241174

• Loeber O, Wijsen C. Factors Influencing the Percentage of Second Trimester Abortions in the Netherlands Factors Influencing the Percentage of Second Trimester Abortions in the Netherlands. Reprod Heal Matters 2008; 16: 31–30.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18772081

• Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, Loeber O, Ozalp S, Webb A. Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10: 51–8.
  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625180500035231

• Welsh P, McCarthy M, Cromer B. Abortion in Adolescence: A Four-Country Comparison. Women’s Health Issues 2001; 11: 73–9.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11275509

• De Zordo S. From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña. Glob Public Heal An Int J Res Policy Pract 2017: 1–13.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278744

• Baron C, Cameron S, Johnstone A. Do women seeking termination of pregnancy need pre-abortion counselling? Fam Plann Reprod Heal Care 2015; 45: 181–5.
  https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/41/3/181

• Best A. Abortion Rights along the Irish-English Border and the Liminality of Women’s Experiences. Dialect Anthropol 2005; 29: 423–37.
  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-005-3863-x

• Caird L, Cameron ST, Hough T, Mackay L, Glasier A. Initiatives to close the gap in inequalities in abortion provision in a remote and rural UK setting. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care 2015; 42: 68 LP-70.
  https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/42/1/68

• Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: An international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights 2017; 19: 55–68. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473038/
  
• Cochrane RA, Cameron ST. Attitudes of Scottish abortion care providers towards provision of abortion after 16 weeks’ gestation within Scotland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2013; 18: 215–20.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23521135

• Francome C. Irish Women Who Seek Abortions in England. Fam Plann Perspect 1992; 24: 265–8.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2135856?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

• Gerdts C, DeZordo S, Mishtal J, Barr-Walker J, Lohr, Lohr PA. Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2016; 21: 401–7.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27539129

• Heller R, Purcell C, Mackay L, Caird L, Cameron ST. Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 123: 1684–91.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.14117/abstract

• Jones RK, Henshaw SK. Mifepristone for Early Medical Abortion: Experiences in France, Great Britain and Sweden. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002; 34: 154–61. https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2002/05/mifepristone-early-medical-abortion-experiences-france-great-britain-and

• Lee E, Ingham R. Why do women present late for induced abortion? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 479–89.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20338814

• Marie Stopes International. General practitioners: attitudes to abortion 2007. 2007. https://www.shnwales.org.uk/Documents/485/Report, GPs attitudes to abortion 2007 Marie Stopes.pdf
• Roe J, Francome C, Bush M. Recruitment and training of British obstetrician-gynaecologists for abortion provision: conscientious objection versus opting out. Reprod Health Matters 1999; 7: 97–105.
  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90010-1

• Purcell C, Cameron S, Caird L, et al. Access to and experience of later abortion: accounts from women in Scotland. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014; 46: 101–8.
  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1363/46e1214/full

• Purcell C, Hilton S, Mcdaid L. The stigmatisation of abortion: a qualitative analysis of print media in Great Britain in 2010. Cult Health Sex 2014; 16.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115952

• Strickland SL. Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey. J Med Ethics 2011; 38: 22–5.
  https://jme.bmj.com/content/38/1/22

• DREES (Direction de la recherche, des études de l’évaluation et des statistiques). 211 900 interruptions volontaires de grossesse en 2016. 2017 https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/er_1013.pdf

• The Federal Health Monitoring System. Abortions. Fed. Stat. Off. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Health/Abortions/Abortions.html#Tabellen

• Ministry of Health. Induced abortions – Migration. stats. 2015. https://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?lang=en&SubSessionId=e753d38d-ebd7-43cc-baa9-83f52d3dc3f1&themetreeid=36
• Italia, Ministero della Salute (2016) Relazione sull’attuazione della Legge contenente norme per la tutela della tutela sociale della maternità e per l’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza. Dati definitivi 2014-2015. Roma: Ministero della Salute. https://www.salute.gov.it/portale/documentazione/p6_2_2_1.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=2552
• Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Interruzione volontaria di gravidanza: la relazione al Parlamento 2014
  https://www.epicentro.iss.it/problemi/ivg/Relazione2014.asp

• IGZ, “Jaarrapportage 2012 van de wet afbreking zwangerschap,” IGZ (Netherlands). https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2013/12/06/jaarrapportage-2012-van-de-wet-afbreking-zwangerschap
• Annual Report 2015 of the Maternity Pregnancy Act. 2017 https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2017/02/09/jaarrapportage-2015-van-de-wet-afbreking-zwangerschap (accessed July 30, 2017).

• Ministerio de Sanidad SS e I. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad – Profesionales – Interrupción voluntaria del embarazo – Datos Estadísticos – Tablas y Figuras. Minist. Sanidad, Serv. Soc. e Igual. https://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/embarazo/tablas_figuras.htm
• Gobierno de España, 2016. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo: Datos definitivos correspondientes al año 2015. https://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/embarazo/docs/IVE_2015.pdf

• Department of Health. 2016. Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2015. London: Abortion Statistics, DH.
  https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/abortion-statistics-england-and-wales-2015.

• UK, Department of Health. 2017. Abortion statistics England and Wales: 2016. London: Abortion Statistics, DH.
  https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/report-on-abortion-statistics-in-england-and-wales-for-2016

• Czerwinski A. Sex, Politics, and Religion: The Clash between Poland and the European Union over Abortion. Denver J Int Law Policy 2003; 32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16482688
• Gerdts C, DePiñeres T, Hajri S, et al. Denial of abortion in legal settings. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2015; 41: 161–3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25511805
• Gissler M, Fronteira I, Jahn A, et al. Terminations of pregnancy in the European Union. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 119: 324–32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129480
• Mishtal J. Quiet Contestations of Irish Abortion Law: Abortion Politics in Flux? In: Transcending Borders: Abortion in the Past and Present, Pelgrave Macmillan 2017.
  https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-48399-3_12

• Mishtal, J. The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Ohio University Press 2015.
  https://www.ohioswallow.com/book/The+Politics+of+Morality

• Pinter B. Medico-legal aspects of abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2002; 7: 15–9.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12041859

• European Committee of Social Rights. Decision on the merits: International Planned Parenthood Federation – European Network (IPPF v. Italy). Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
  https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng/?i=cc-87-2012-dmerits-en

• IPPF European Network. Abortion legislation in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: International Planned Parenthood Federation, 2012
  https://www.ippfen.org/resource/abortion-legislation-europe

• Belgio
  • La loi du 15 octobre 2018 encadre l’interruption volontaire de grossesse. http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=fr&la=F&cn=2018101503&table_name=loi
• Francia
  • Loi n° 75-17 du 17 janvier 1975 relative à l’interruption volontaire de la grossesse. 2013
    https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000700230&dateTexte=20130913 
  • Article L. 2212-1 du Code de la Santé Publique. 2016.
    https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000006687520&dateTexte=&categorieLien=cid
  • Loi 2016-41 du 26 janvier 2016 de modernisation de notre système de santé. 2016.
    https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/loi/2016/1/26/AFSX1418355L/jo/texte

• Germania
  • Gesetz zur Vermeidung und Bewältigung von Schwangerschaftskonflikten (Schwangerschaftskonfliktgesetz – SchKG) available here:  https://www.buzer.de/gesetz/6462/index.htm
  • Strafgesetzbuch (StGB), § 218 Schwangerschaftsabbruch und § 219 Beratung der Schwangeren in einer Not- und Konfliktlage available here: https://www.buzer.de/s1.htm?g=StGB&a=218-219b

• Italia
  • Legge 194/78 “Norme per la tutela sociale della maternità e per l’interruzione volontaria di gravidanza”. 1978.
    https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_normativa_845_allegato.pdf
  • Ministero della Salute. Linee di Indirizzo sulla Interruzione Volontaria di Gravidanza con mifepristone e prostaglandine. 2010
    https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1302_allegato.pdf

• Irlanda
  • Sheldon S. ‘How can a state control swallowing?’: Medical abortion and the law. 2016.
    https://www.kent.ac.uk/law/mabal/Medical Abortion and the Law_web.pdf
  • The Citizen’s Assembly. First Report and Recommendations of the Citizens’ Assembly: The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. 2017.
    https://www.citizensassembly.ie/en/The-Eighth-Amendment-of-the-Constitution/Final-Report-on-the-Eighth-Amendment-of-the-Constitution/Final-Report-incl-Appendix-A-D.pdf
  • Center for Reproductive Rights. A, B and C v. Ireland. Cent Reprod Rights 2012. https://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/crr_ABC_Factsheet.pdf

• Paesi Bassi
  • Wet afbreking zwangerschap. Overheid.nl, 1981
    https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0003396/2011-10-10

• Polonia
  • Ustawa z dnia 7 stycznia 1993 r. o planowaniu rodziny, ochronie płodu ludzkiego i warunkach dopuszczalności przerywania ciąży.
    https://www.reproductiverights.org/case/tysiac-v-poland-european-court-of-human-rights
• Spagna
  • Ley Orgánica 2/2010, de 3 de marzo, de salud sexual y reproductiva y de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. 2010 https://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/embarazo/docs/LeyOrg_2_10.pdf
  • Ley Orgánica 11/2015, de 21 de septiembre, para reforzar la protección de las menores y mujeres con capacidad modificada judicialmente en la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. 2015
    https://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/embarazo/docs/LeyOrg11_2015.pdf

• Regno Unito
  • Abortion Act of 1967. 1967.
    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87